Claude Sonnet 5 vs Muse Wonder Full
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents
Muse Wonder Full is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own02Muse Wonder Full2 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Muse Wonder Full2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Muse Wonder Full2 of 2 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software01Muse Wonder Full1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Muse Wonder Full1 of 1 test
Coding and long documents rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Muse Wonder Full pulls ahead
- Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+43points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+19.7points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+16.4points ahead
Where Claude Sonnet 5 pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
AgentsMuse Wonder Full
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Muse Wonder Full by 4314.157.1+43
- GDPValMuse Wonder Full by 19.748.267.9+19.7
ReasoningMuse Wonder Full
- CritPtMuse Wonder Full by 1616.932.9+16
- Humanity's Last ExamMuse Wonder Full by 12.341.353.6+12.3
FactsMuse Wonder Full
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationMuse Wonder Full by 16.460.677+16.4
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMuse Wonder Full by 3.14043.2+3.1
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- GDP (Surge AI)Claude Sonnet 5 by 48.481.633.2+48.4
- DeepSWE 1.1Muse Wonder Full by 255479+25
- OSWorld 2.1 partialMuse Wonder Full by 21.45778.4+21.4
- Program BenchClaude Sonnet 5 by 18.377.359+18.3
- AA IntelligenceMuse Wonder Full by 17.638.255.8+17.6
- AA-OmniscienceMuse Wonder Full by 13.716.430.1+13.7
- HealthBench ProfessionalMuse Wonder Full by 4.557.862.3+4.5
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5 or Muse Wonder Full?
Muse Wonder Full wins all five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and long documents. Claude Sonnet 5 wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Muse Wonder Full. It wins the one coding test both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 8 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.