Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 11 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp pulls ahead
Where MiniMax VL 01 pulls ahead
- Reads text in imagesOCRBench+1.9points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 11 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsGemini 2.0 Flash Exp
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- OlympiadBenchGemini 2.0 Flash Exp by 21.946.124.2+21.9
- MEGA-Bench_macroGemini 2.0 Flash Exp by 6.553.947.4+6.5
- DocVQAMiniMax VL 01 by 3.592.996.4+3.5
- ChartQAMiniMax VL 01 by 3.488.391.7+3.4
- ChartQA_relaxedMiniMax VL 01 by 3.488.391.7+3.4
- AI2DGemini 2.0 Flash Exp by 1.885.183.3+1.8
- M-LongDoc (multimodal long-document benchmark)MiniMax VL 01 by 1.131.432.5+1.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp or MiniMax VL 01?
Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. MiniMax VL 01 wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 11 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.