Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Google · released

Wins 2 of 2 areas

Coding · Reasoning

Alibaba · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 19 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding rests on a single test.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Gemini 2.0 Flash ExpNo current price is tracked.
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B$0.47 to read · $0.49 to write$0.97Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+14.5points aheadGemini 2.0 Flash Exp63.6Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B49.1
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+7.3points aheadGemini 2.0 Flash Exp34Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B26.7

Where Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 19 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGemini 2.0 Flash Exp
  • SciCodeGemini 2.0 Flash Exp by 7.33426.7+7.3

Full coding ranking

ReasoningGemini 2.0 Flash Exp

Full reasoning ranking

Other results16 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp or Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp wins all two areas where both have results: coding and reasoning. Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Exp. It wins the one coding test both models report.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 19 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 16 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.