Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Muse Ember

Google · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Meta · released

Wins 2 of 2 areas

Coding · Agents

Muse Ember is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 6 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding and agents rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$0.30 to read · $2.50 to write$2.80Price from Artificial Analysis
Muse Ember$0.10 to read · $0.50 to write$0.60Price from Artificial Analysis

Muse Ember costs 79% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Muse Ember pulls ahead

  • Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+39.9points aheadMuse Ember40.9Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite1

Where Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 6 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingMuse Ember

Full coding ranking

AgentsMuse Ember
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Muse Ember by 39.9140.9+39.9

Full agents ranking

Other results4 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • CritPt v2 HardMuse Ember by 35.53.539+35.5
  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1Muse Ember by 20020+20
  • HLE-DiamondMuse Ember by 15.29.925.1+15.2
  • GDP (Surge AI)Muse Ember by 9.213.622.8+9.2

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Muse Ember?

Muse Ember wins all two areas where both have results: coding and agents. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Muse Ember. It wins the one coding test both models report.

Which is cheaper?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Muse Ember costs $0.10 and $0.50. That makes Muse Ember about 79% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 6 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 2 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.