Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemma 3 12B vs GPT-4o mini

Google · released

Wins 1 of 5 areas

Following instructions

OpenAI · released

Wins 3 of 5 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning

GPT-4o mini is the stronger all-rounder.Gemma 3 12B is cheaper and better at following instructions.

Scores updated · 35 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Following instructions rests on a single test.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Gemma 3 12B$0.05 to read · $0.15 to write$0.20Price from deepinfra
GPT-4o mini$0.15 to read · $0.60 to write$0.75Price from Artificial Analysis

Gemma 3 12B costs 73% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where GPT-4o mini pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+7.7points aheadGPT-4o mini42.6Gemma 3 12B34.9
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+6.5points aheadGPT-4o mini22.9Gemma 3 12B16.4
  • Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+4points aheadGPT-4o mini41.5Gemma 3 12B37.5

Where Gemma 3 12B pulls ahead

  • Math problems shown in pictures and chartsMathVista+6.2points aheadGemma 3 12B62.9GPT-4o mini56.7
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+5.7points aheadGemma 3 12B36.7GPT-4o mini31

Every test, side by side

All 35 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGPT-4o mini

Full coding ranking

AgentsGPT-4o mini

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGPT-4o mini

Full reasoning ranking

Images and chartsEven

Full images and charts ranking

Following instructionsGemma 3 12B
  • IFBenchGemma 3 12B by 5.736.731+5.7

Full following instructions ranking

Other results25 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemma 3 12B or GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, agents and reasoning. Gemma 3 12B wins following instructions, and costs 73% less. They are level on images and charts.

Which is better for coding?

GPT-4o mini. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemma 3 12B wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Gemma 3 12B costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-4o mini costs $0.15 and $0.60. That makes Gemma 3 12B about 73% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 35 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 25 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.