Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Z.ai · released

Wins 1 of 2 areas

Coding

MiniMax · released

Wins 1 of 2 areas

Reasoning

The two are evenly matched.GLM-5.3 is better at coding; MiniMax M3.1 Flash at reasoning.

Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding and reasoning rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GLM-5.3$1.40 to read · $4.40 to write$5.80Price from Z.ai's own price page
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.15 to read · $0.60 to write$0.75Price from Artificial Analysis

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 87% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where GLM-5.3 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Where MiniMax M3.1 Flash pulls ahead

  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+1.1points aheadMiniMax M3.1 Flash43.4GLM-5.342.3

Every test, side by side

All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGLM-5.3

Full coding ranking

ReasoningMiniMax M3.1 Flash

Full reasoning ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • SWE Refactor BenchMiniMax M3.1 Flash by 12.610.423+12.6
  • LOCA-Bench 256KMiniMax M3.1 Flash by 1050.360.3+10
  • GDP.pdf AAMiniMax M3.1 Flash by 9.611.220.8+9.6
  • DeepSWE 1.1MiniMax M3.1 Flash by 6.866.973.7+6.8
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0GLM-5.3 by 3.741.838.1+3.7
  • NL2RepoMiniMax M3.1 Flash by 3.25861.2+3.2
  • CyberGymGLM-5.3 by 2.384.582.2+2.3
  • PostTrain Bench v1.1MiniMax M3.1 Flash by 1.837.539.3+1.8
  • BankerToolBenchMiniMax M3.1 Flash by 1.774.576.2+1.7
  • Agents' Last ExamMiniMax M3.1 Flash by 1.128.529.6+1.1
  • PostTrainBenchtie39.839.3tie

Questions people ask

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GLM-5.3 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash each win one of the two areas where both have results. GLM-5.3 wins coding; MiniMax M3.1 Flash wins reasoning. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 87% less.

Which is better for coding?

GLM-5.3. It wins the one coding test both models report.

Which is cheaper?

GLM-5.3 costs $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. That makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash about 87% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 2 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.