InternVL3_5-2B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 6 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Images and charts rests on a single test.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where InternVL3_5-2B pulls ahead
- Reads text in imagesOCRBench+8.3points ahead
Where Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 6 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsInternVL3_5-2B
- OCRBenchInternVL3_5-2B by 8.383.475.1+8.3
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- HallusionBenchQwen3 VL 2B Instruct by 19.747.667.3+19.7
- ChartQA TestInternVL3_5-2B by 12.481.769.3+12.4
- DocVQA-valInternVL3_5-2B by 5.988.482.5+5.9
- MMMBInternVL3_5-2B by 476.372.3+4
- OCRBench v2_enInternVL3_5-2B by 3.845.541.7+3.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, InternVL3_5-2B or Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct?
InternVL3_5-2B wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 6 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.