Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 2B?

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.5 2B

15 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 15 shared benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on 15 and Qwen3.5 2B on 0. The widest gap is scicode, where Muse Spark 1.1 scores 58.8 against 7.2.

METAVSALIBABA15 SHARED15–0 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1MARGINQwen3.5 2B

AA Agentic Index27.50.8

AA Intelligence34.36.9

AA-LCR77.725.6

AA-Omniscience28.1-60.2

Artificial Analysis Coding Index71.32.9

critpt15.10

gdpval39.70

GPQA Diamond89.851.6

HLE62.15

multichallenge75.333.7

OmniScience Accuracy528.1

OmniScience Non-Hallucination5025.8

scicode58.87.2

TauBench V3 - Banking31.82.5

Terminal-Bench 2.1803

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare Muse Spark 1.1 withALL PAIRINGS →

MetaLlama 3.1 Instruct 405B

Across the fieldQwen3.6 27B Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.8 Max Preview Qwen3.7 Plus Preview Claude Opus 4 Qwen3.5 4B Gemini 3.6 Flash Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare Qwen3.5 2B withALL PAIRINGS →

AlibabaQwen3.5 35B A3B Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B Qwen3.5 27B Qwen3.6 Plus

Across the fieldGLM-5.1 GLM-5.2 o4-mini Claude Sonnet 4.6 o1 Gemma 4 31B Kimi K2 Instruct Gemma 4 E2B