Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen3.5 2B

Alibaba · released

Wins 6 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Alibaba · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 34 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Qwen3.5 27B$0.30 to read · $2.40 to write$2.70Price from Alibaba's own price page
Qwen3.5 2BNo current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3.5 27B pulls ahead

  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+56.7points aheadQwen3.5 27B77.7Qwen3.5 2B21
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+44.1points aheadQwen3.5 27B75.6Qwen3.5 2B31.5
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+40.2points aheadQwen3.5 27B85.8Qwen3.5 2B45.6

Where Qwen3.5 2B pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 34 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3.5 27B

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3.5 27B

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3.5 27B

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3.5 27B

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsQwen3.5 27B

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3.5 27B

Full following instructions ranking

Other results18 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Qwen3.5 27B or Qwen3.5 2B?

Qwen3.5 27B wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3.5 2B wins none. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3.5 27B. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Qwen3.5 2B wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 34 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 16 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 18 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.