May 5–11: 3 frontier papers out of 1,366 read.
Papers rated as moving the field
How we choose“As an example, we investigate same-provider preference in final-round votes and find that models are 8.3 p.p. more likely to support a same-provider finalist than finalists from other providers.”
The authors, in the abstract
A Saturation- and Contamination-Resistant Benchmark from Multiagent Games
“We identify six exploit categories and find that 72% of reward hacking episodes include explicit chain-of-thought rationale, suggesting models often frame exploits as legitimate problem-solving.”
“We demonstrate that AU reduces package hallucination rates by 81%, corresponding to a substantial reduction in slopsquatting attack surface, while maintaining performance on standard coding benchmarks.”
May 5–11: 70 cleared, 3 frontier
The week’s papers have not been sorted into fields yet.
Papers this week that name the model
Papers this week with an author at the lab
67 papers