July 21–27: 11 frontier papers out of 1,744 read.
Papers rated as moving the field
How we choose“Evaluating 14 frontier and open-weight models, we find the benchmark genuinely challenging (best score 58.7% from Gemini 3.1 Pro), highly discriminative, and robust to the choice of judge.”
The authors, in the abstract
GAMUT, a Benchmark for Factual Completeness
“Under verified single-turn evaluation with seven frontier LLMs, we find that the best-performing model (GPT-5.5) achieves a 0.88x geometric mean speedup, significantly lower than the 1.43x speedup observed under the standard evaluation protocol.”
“ProGraph averages 80.1% on MemHop (matching the FullContext reference) and 78.4% on LoCoMo (exceeding FullContext by 11.3pp), outperforming Mem0, A-Mem, HippoRAG, and RAG on both.”
“DARWIN-Guard achieves an average unsafe recall of 91.6% across 12 safety benchmarks, outperforming strong guardrails such as YuFeng-XGuard and Nemotron Guard, while maintaining a nearly 100% pass rate on standard benign datasets.”
“Zero-shot experiments with RL, VLA, and modular baselines show that current agents remain far from solving cross-context navigation: end-to-end VLAs obtain the highest zero-shot success, while the modular method provides the strongest safety profile.”
Jul 21–27: 158 cleared, 11 frontier
The week’s papers have not been sorted into fields yet.
Papers this week that name the model
Papers this week with an author at the lab
147 papers