Apertus 70B Instruct vs Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions
Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 12 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+46.1points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+43.2points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+31.6points ahead
Where Apertus 70B Instruct pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+9.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 12 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- SciCodeApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 31.65.737.3+31.6
- Terminal-Bench HardApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 14.4014.4+14.4
ReasoningApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- GPQA DiamondApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 46.127.273.3+46.1
- Humanity's Last ExamApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 5.35.510.8+5.3
- CritPttie00.3tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationApertus 70B Instruct by 9.117.28.1+9.1
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 5.411.617+5.4
Long documentsApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- AA-LCRApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 50.3050.3+50.3
Following instructionsApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- IFBenchApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 43.225.969.1+43.2
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 56.412.969.3+56.4
- AA IntelligenceApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 8.35.113.4+8.3
- AA-OmniscienceApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 2.1-61.5-59.4+2.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apertus 70B Instruct or Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker?
Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. Apertus 70B Instruct wins none. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Apertus 70B Instruct wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 12 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.