Apertus 70B Instruct vs HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 12 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software02HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)2 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking01HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)1 of 3 tests · 2 ties
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+34.3points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+22.7points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+12points ahead
Where Apertus 70B Instruct pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 12 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- SciCodeHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 22.75.728.4+22.7
- Terminal-Bench HardHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 12.1012.1+12.1
ReasoningHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- GPQA DiamondHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 34.327.261.5+34.3
- CritPttie00tie
- Humanity's Last Examtie5.55.5tie
FactsHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 3.811.615.4+3.8
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 1.617.218.8+1.6
Long documentsHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- AA-LCRHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 13.7013.7+13.7
Following instructionsHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- IFBenchHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 1225.937.9+12
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 74.512.987.4+74.5
- AA-OmniscienceHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 8.2-61.5-53.3+8.2
- AA IntelligenceHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 6.35.111.4+6.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apertus 70B Instruct or HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)?
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) wins all five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Apertus 70B Instruct wins none.
Which is better for coding?
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B). It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Apertus 70B Instruct wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 12 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.