Apodex 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Apodex 1.1 is the stronger all-rounder.Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is cheaper.
Scores updated · 17 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own30Apodex 1.13 of 4 tests · 1 tie
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Apodex 1.13 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Apodex 1.12 of 2 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Images and charts and long documents rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs 47% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+38.6points ahead
- Long professional tasks in banking, consulting and lawAA ApexAgents+19points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+16.9points ahead
Where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+4.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 17 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingApodex 1.1
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Apodex 1.1 by 38.669.731.1+38.6
- SciCodeApodex 1.1 by 2.145.543.4+2.1
AgentsApodex 1.1
- GDPValApodex 1.1 by 34.634.60+34.6
- AA ApexAgentsApodex 1.1 by 1931.212.2+19
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingApodex 1.1 by 15.525.29.7+15.5
- Terminal-Bench 4.0tie00.5tie
ReasoningApodex 1.1
- Humanity's Last ExamApodex 1.1 by 16.934.117.2+16.9
- GPQA DiamondApodex 1.1 by 4.286.482.2+4.2
- CritPtApodex 1.1 by 3.54.61.1+3.5
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 4.631.736.3+4.6
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationApodex 1.1 by 4.321.617.3+4.3
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA Agentic IndexApodex 1.1 by 33.436.63.2+33.4
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexApodex 1.1 by 26.160.834.7+26.1
- AA IntelligenceApodex 1.1 by 10.826.415.6+10.8
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 5.5-21.9-16.4+5.5
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?
Apodex 1.1 wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts and long documents. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview wins none, but costs 47% less. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Apodex 1.1. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Apodex 1.1 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 and $1.50. That makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview about 47% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 17 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.