Apodex 1.1 vs JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
Wins 2 of 6 areas
Images and charts · Long documents
Wins 3 of 6 areas
Agents · Reasoning · Facts
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B wins more areas, narrowly.Apodex 1.1 is better at images and charts.
Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own03JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B3 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B2 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking12JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B2 of 3 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- CodingWriting and fixing software11Even1 each
Images and charts and long documents rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+21.4points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+17.7points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+9.5points ahead
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+15.1points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+10.1points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+1.9points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingEven
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Apodex 1.1 by 10.169.759.6+10.1
- SciCodeJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 6.545.552+6.5
AgentsJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
- GDPValJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 6.634.841.4+6.6
- Terminal-Bench 4.0JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 303+3
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 2.825.228+2.8
ReasoningJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
- Humanity's Last ExamJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 9.534.143.6+9.5
- CritPtJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 9.44.614+9.4
- GPQA DiamondApodex 1.1 by 1.986.484.5+1.9
FactsJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 21.421.643+21.4
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 17.731.749.4+17.7
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 42.5-21.920.6+42.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexApodex 1.1 by 8.460.852.4+8.4
- AA IntelligenceJT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B by 7.526.433.9+7.5
- AA Agentic IndexApodex 1.1 by 1.736.634.9+1.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B?
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B wins three of the six areas where both have results: agents, reasoning and facts. Apodex 1.1 wins images and charts and long documents. They are level on coding.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 2 both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 12 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.