Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 5 areas
Long documents
Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct is better at long documents.
Scores updated · 11 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker3 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker2 of 2 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software10Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct1 of 1 test
Coding, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker pulls ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+28.6points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+10.1points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+5.4points ahead
Where Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+5points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 11 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker
- Terminal-Bench HardApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 4.510.66.1+4.5
ReasoningApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker
- GPQA DiamondApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 5.471.365.9+5.4
- Humanity's Last ExamApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 5.212.16.9+5.2
- CritPtApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 1.11.10+1.1
FactsApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 10.114.74.6+10.1
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 1.516.415+1.5
Long documentsQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct
- AA-LCRQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct by 521.326.3+5
Following instructionsApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker
- IFBenchApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 28.661.733.1+28.6
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 58.268.410.2+58.2
- AA-OmniscienceApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 11.3-54.8-66.2+11.3
- AA IntelligenceApriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker by 6.313.87.5+6.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker or Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct?
Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts and following instructions. Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct wins long documents.
Which is better for coding?
Apriel-v1.5-15B-Thinker. It wins the one coding test both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 11 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 8 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.