Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Atria Dawn vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

shanghai-ai-lab

Wins 2 of 2 areas

Coding · Agents

Google · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Atria Dawn is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 6 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Agents rests on a single test.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Atria DawnNo current price is tracked.
Gemini 3.1 Pro$2.00 to read · $12.00 to write$14Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Atria Dawn pulls ahead

  • Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+6.6points aheadAtria Dawn92.5Gemini 3.1 Pro85.9
  • Long, multi-file coding tasks in real codebasesSWE-bench Pro+5.4points aheadAtria Dawn59.6Gemini 3.1 Pro54.2
  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+4.5points aheadAtria Dawn78.3Gemini 3.1 Pro73.8

Where Gemini 3.1 Pro pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 6 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingAtria Dawn

Full coding ranking

AgentsAtria Dawn

Full agents ranking

Other results3 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Atria Dawn or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Atria Dawn wins all two areas where both have results: coding and agents. Gemini 3.1 Pro wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Atria Dawn. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemini 3.1 Pro wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 6 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.