Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1
Wins 3 of 5 areas
Coding · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 5 areas
Reasoning
Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger all-rounder.Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 is better at reasoning.
Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V12 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+49.9points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+9points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+4.7points ahead
Where Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+23.5points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+3.9points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+2points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude 3.5 Haiku
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude 3.5 Haiku by 2.32.30+2.3
- SciCodetie27.428.2tie
ReasoningLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1
- GPQA DiamondLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 by 23.540.864.3+23.5
- Humanity's Last ExamLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 by 23.65.6+2
- CritPttie00tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.5 Haiku by 49.958.99+49.9
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 by 3.913.217.1+3.9
Following instructionsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- IFBenchClaude 3.5 Haiku by 4.742.838.1+4.7
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 35.8-22.5-58.3+35.8
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.5 Haiku by 6.515.99.4+6.5
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 by 2.324.626.9+2.3
- AA Intelligencetie8.98.9tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1?
Claude 3.5 Haiku wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, long documents and following instructions. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 wins reasoning. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Haiku. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1 wins none, and 1 is a tie.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.