Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Wins 2 of 6 areas
Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 2 of 6 areas
Coding · Reasoning
The two are evenly matched.Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at long documents and following instructions; Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 at reasoning and coding.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.52 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.52 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own00Even0 each · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+34points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+7.4points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+4points ahead
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+37.1points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+5.8points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+2.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
- SciCodeLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 by 7.427.434.8+7.4
- Terminal-Bench HardLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 by 32.35.3+3
ReasoningLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
- GPQA DiamondLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 by 3440.874.8+34
- Humanity's Last ExamLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 by 3.73.67.3+3.7
- CritPttie00tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.5 Haiku by 37.158.921.8+37.1
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 by 413.217.2+4
Following instructionsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- IFBenchClaude 3.5 Haiku by 5.842.837+5.8
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 25.1-22.5-47.6+25.1
- AA Agentic IndexLlama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 by 7.51.99.4+7.5
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 by 3.524.628.1+3.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding Indextie15.915.1tie
- AA Intelligencetie8.99tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5?
Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 each win two of the six areas where both have results. Claude 3.5 Haiku wins long documents and following instructions; Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins coding and reasoning. They are level on agents and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Llama Nemotron Super 49B V1.5. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3.5 Haiku wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.