Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning
Wins 1 of 6 areas
Long documents
Wins 3 of 6 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Following instructions
Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning wins more areas, narrowly.Claude 3.5 Haiku is better at long documents.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software01Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own00Even0 each · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+28.7points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+14.2points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+5.2points ahead
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+49.5points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+12.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning
- Terminal-Bench HardMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning by 1.52.33.8+1.5
- SciCodetie27.428.2tie
ReasoningMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning
- GPQA DiamondMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning by 28.740.869.5+28.7
- Humanity's Last ExamMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning by 5.23.68.8+5.2
- CritPttie00tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.5 Haiku by 49.558.99.4+49.5
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning by 213.215.2+2
Long documentsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- AA-LCRClaude 3.5 Haiku by 12.627.314.7+12.6
Following instructionsMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning
- IFBenchMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning by 14.242.857+14.2
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 39.2-22.5-61.7+39.2
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning by 21.924.646.5+21.9
- AA Agentic IndexMotif-2-12.7B-Reasoning by 17.31.919.2+17.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.5 Haiku by 415.911.9+4
- AA Intelligencetie8.99.2tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning?
Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning wins three of the six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and following instructions. Claude 3.5 Haiku wins long documents. They are level on agents and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3.5 Haiku wins none, and 1 is a tie.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.