Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Tiny Aya Global
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude 3.5 Haiku2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude 3.5 Haiku2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+55.1points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+23.8points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+22.7points ahead
Where Tiny Aya Global pulls ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+1.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude 3.5 Haiku
- SciCodeClaude 3.5 Haiku by 23.827.43.6+23.8
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude 3.5 Haiku by 2.32.30+2.3
ReasoningEven
- GPQA DiamondClaude 3.5 Haiku by 10.340.830.5+10.3
- Humanity's Last ExamTiny Aya Global by 1.63.65.2+1.6
- CritPttie00tie
FactsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.5 Haiku by 55.158.93.8+55.1
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 3.5 Haiku by 7.113.26.1+7.1
Following instructionsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- IFBenchClaude 3.5 Haiku by 22.742.820.1+22.7
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 61.8-22.5-84.3+61.8
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude 3.5 Haiku by 24.624.60+24.6
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 4.18.94.8+4.1
- AA Agentic IndexClaude 3.5 Haiku by 1.91.90+1.9
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Tiny Aya Global?
Claude 3.5 Haiku wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, facts, long documents and following instructions. Tiny Aya Global wins none. They are level on reasoning.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Haiku. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Tiny Aya Global wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.