Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions
Claude Opus 4 is the stronger all-rounder.Claude 3.7 Sonnet is cheaper.
Scores updated · 32 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking03Claude Opus 43 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Claude Opus 42 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked02Claude Opus 42 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Claude Opus 41 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs 80% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude Opus 4 pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+17.6points ahead
- Common-sense trick questionsSimpleBench+12.4points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+9.9points ahead
Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet pulls ahead
- College exam questions with charts, maps and diagramsMMMU+1.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 32 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude Opus 4
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude Opus 4 by 9.921.231.1+9.9
- SWE-bench VerifiedClaude Opus 4 by 2.270.372.5+2.2
- SciCodetie40.339.8tie
ReasoningClaude Opus 4
- SimpleBenchClaude Opus 4 by 12.446.458.8+12.4
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude Opus 4 by 2.69.712.3+2.6
- GPQA DiamondClaude Opus 4 by 2.477.279.6+2.4
Images and chartsEven
- LMArena · VisionClaude Opus 4 by 23 rating points11691192+23 rating
- MMMUClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 1.37573.7+1.3
Following instructionsClaude Opus 4
- Multi-ChallengeClaude Opus 4 by 751.658.6+7
- IFBenchClaude Opus 4 by 5.448.353.7+5.4
Other results21 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- HMMT Feb. 2025Claude Opus 4 by 28.331.760+28.3
- AIME 2025Claude Opus 4 by 20.754.875.5+20.7
- metr_re_benchClaude Opus 4 by 20020+20
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude Opus 4 by 18.754.773.4+18.7
- Aider-PolyglotClaude Opus 4 by 10.360.470.7+10.3
- Terminal-BenchClaude Opus 4 by 835.243.2+8
- HarmBenchClaude Opus 4 by 7.484.391.7+7.4
- ARC-AGI-1Claude Opus 4 by 7.128.635.7+7.1
- IFEvalClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 5.893.287.4+5.8
- bbqClaude Opus 4 by 592.197.1+5
- AIR-Bench 2024Claude Opus 4 by 3.981.885.7+3.9
- AA IntelligenceClaude Opus 4 by 2.917.720.6+2.9
- MMMLUClaude Opus 4 by 2.786.188.8+2.7
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 2.436.434+2.4
- MATH-500 (EM)Claude 3.7 Sonnet by 1.896.294.4+1.8
- TAU-bench (airline)Claude Opus 4 by 1.258.459.6+1.2
- metr_swaaClaude Opus 4 by 1.198.799.8+1.1
- anthropic_red_teamtie99.798.9tie
- XSTesttie96.497tie
- TAU-bench (retail)tie81.281.4tie
- simple_safety_teststie100100tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Opus 4 wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins none, but costs 80% less. They are level on images and charts.
Which is better for coding?
Claude Opus 4. It wins 2 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins none, and 1 is a tie.
Which is cheaper?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00 and $75.00. That makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet about 80% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 32 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 21 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.