Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger all-rounder.ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs 92% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+47.7points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+26.9points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+15.1points ahead
Where ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+3.9points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 15.121.26.1+15.1
- SciCodeClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 8.840.331.5+8.8
ReasoningEven
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 6.49.73.3+6.4
- GPQA DiamondERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by 3.977.281.1+3.9
- CritPttie0.90tie
FactsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 26.96033.1+26.9
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 8.92819.1+8.9
Following instructionsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- IFBenchClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 9.248.339.1+9.2
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude 3.7 Sonnet by 54.754.70+54.7
- AA Agentic IndexClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 37370+37
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 34.4-0.7-35.1+34.4
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 21.936.414.5+21.9
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 10.217.77.5+10.2
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, facts, long documents and following instructions. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins none, but costs 92% less. They are level on reasoning.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28 and $1.10. That makes ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B about 92% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.