Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs EXAONE 4.0 1.2B
Wins 6 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+53points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+31points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+25.7points ahead
Where EXAONE 4.0 1.2B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- SciCodeClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 3140.39.3+31
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 21.221.20+21.2
ReasoningClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- GPQA DiamondClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 25.777.251.5+25.7
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 3.79.76+3.7
- CritPttie0.90tie
FactsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 53607+53
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 21.2286.8+21.2
Following instructionsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- IFBenchClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 25.348.323+25.3
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 79.1-0.7-79.8+79.1
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude 3.7 Sonnet by 38.354.716.4+38.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 33.336.43.1+33.3
- AA Agentic IndexClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 31.5375.5+31.5
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 12.417.75.3+12.4
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or EXAONE 4.0 1.2B?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. EXAONE 4.0 1.2B wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; EXAONE 4.0 1.2B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.