Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 12 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+41.2points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+38points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+15.7points ahead
Where HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 12 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- SciCodeClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 11.940.328.4+11.9
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 9.121.212.1+9.1
ReasoningClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- GPQA DiamondClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 15.777.261.5+15.7
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 4.29.75.5+4.2
- CritPttie0.90tie
FactsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 41.26018.8+41.2
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 12.62815.4+12.6
Following instructionsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- IFBenchClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 10.448.337.9+10.4
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 52.6-0.7-53.3+52.6
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 32.754.787.4+32.7
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 6.317.711.4+6.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins all five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 12 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.