Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Sarvam M (Reasoning)
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude 3.7 Sonnet2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.7 Sonnet1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+50.6points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+35.6points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+22.5points ahead
Where Sarvam M (Reasoning) pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- SciCodeClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 22.540.317.8+22.5
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 18.921.22.3+18.9
ReasoningClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- GPQA DiamondClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 35.677.241.6+35.6
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 6.69.73.1+6.6
- CritPttie0.90tie
FactsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 50.6609.4+50.6
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 12.82815.2+12.8
Following instructionsClaude 3.7 Sonnet
- IFBenchClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 16.548.331.8+16.5
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 60.9-0.7-61.6+60.9
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude 3.7 Sonnet by 54.754.70+54.7
- AA Agentic IndexClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 37370+37
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 28.936.47.5+28.9
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.7 Sonnet by 12.417.75.3+12.4
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Sarvam M (Reasoning)?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins all five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Sarvam M (Reasoning) wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Sarvam M (Reasoning) wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.