Claude 3 Haiku vs GLM-5-Turbo
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Wins 6 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
GLM-5-Turbo is the stronger all-rounder.Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02GLM-5-Turbo2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software02GLM-5-Turbo2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02GLM-5-Turbo2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01GLM-5-Turbo1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01GLM-5-Turbo1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01GLM-5-Turbo1 of 1 test
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Claude 3 Haiku costs 71% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where GLM-5-Turbo pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+47.3points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+44points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+37.1points ahead
Where Claude 3 Haiku pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGLM-5-Turbo
- Terminal-Bench HardGLM-5-Turbo by 32.50.833.3+32.5
- SciCodeGLM-5-Turbo by 2518.643.6+25
ReasoningGLM-5-Turbo
- GPQA DiamondGLM-5-Turbo by 47.337.484.7+47.3
- Humanity's Last ExamGLM-5-Turbo by 23.74.127.8+23.7
- CritPttie00.3tie
FactsGLM-5-Turbo
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGLM-5-Turbo by 17.919.537.4+17.9
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGLM-5-Turbo by 10.917.628.4+10.9
Following instructionsGLM-5-Turbo
- IFBenchGLM-5-Turbo by 37.136.173.2+37.1
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)GLM-5-Turbo by 77.421.198.5+77.4
- AA Agentic IndexGLM-5-Turbo by 59.1766.1+59.1
- AA-OmniscienceGLM-5-Turbo by 32.2-48.6-16.4+32.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM-5-Turbo by 30.16.736.8+30.1
- AA IntelligenceGLM-5-Turbo by 215.626.6+21
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or GLM-5-Turbo?
GLM-5-Turbo wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Claude 3 Haiku wins none, but costs 71% less.
Which is better for coding?
GLM-5-Turbo. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3 Haiku wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; GLM-5-Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. That makes Claude 3 Haiku about 71% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.