Claude 3 Haiku vs HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
Wins 2 of 5 areas
Facts · Long documents
Wins 3 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Following instructions
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) is the stronger all-rounder.Claude 3 Haiku is better at facts.
Scores updated · 12 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software02HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)2 of 2 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up10Claude 3 Haiku1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3 Haiku1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+24.1points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+11.3points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+9.8points ahead
Where Claude 3 Haiku pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+14points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+2.2points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 12 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- Terminal-Bench HardHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 11.30.812.1+11.3
- SciCodeHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 9.818.628.4+9.8
ReasoningHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- GPQA DiamondHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 24.137.461.5+24.1
- Humanity's Last ExamHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 1.44.15.5+1.4
- CritPttie00tie
FactsClaude 3 Haiku
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 3 Haiku by 2.217.615.4+2.2
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationtie19.518.8tie
Following instructionsHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
- IFBenchHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 1.836.137.9+1.8
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 66.321.187.4+66.3
- AA IntelligenceHyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) by 5.85.611.4+5.8
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 3 Haiku by 4.7-48.6-53.3+4.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)?
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and following instructions. Claude 3 Haiku wins facts and long documents.
Which is better for coding?
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B). It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3 Haiku wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 12 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.