Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 6 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 5 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger all-rounder.Claude 3 Haiku is cheaper.

Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude 3 Haiku$0.25 to read · $1.25 to write$1.50Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)$1.20 to read · $6.00 to write$7.20Price from Artificial Analysis

Claude 3 Haiku costs 79% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning) pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+39points aheadQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)76.4Claude 3 Haiku37.4
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+22.3points aheadQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)50Claude 3 Haiku27.7
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+19.7points aheadQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)38.3Claude 3 Haiku18.6

Where Claude 3 Haiku pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)
  • GDPValQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning) by 26.9026.9+26.9

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)
  • AA-LCRQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning) by 22.327.750+22.3

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)
  • IFBenchQwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning) by 836.144.1+8

Full following instructions ranking

Other results5 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning)?

Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning) wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. Claude 3 Haiku wins none, but costs 79% less. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning). It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3 Haiku wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max (Non-Reasoning) costs $1.20 and $6.00. That makes Claude 3 Haiku about 79% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.