Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 6 areas

—

Anthropic · released

Wins 6 of 6 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 21 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Opus 4$15.00 to read · $75.00 to write$90Price from Artificial Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4.6$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Anthropic's own price page

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs 80% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Sonnet 4.6 pulls ahead

  • Abstract visual puzzles that people can solveARC-AGI-2+49.7points aheadClaude Sonnet 4.658.3Claude Opus 48.6
  • Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+21.9points aheadClaude Sonnet 4.653Claude Opus 431.1
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+21.3points aheadClaude Sonnet 4.633.6Claude Opus 412.3

Where Claude Opus 4 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 21 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Sonnet 4.6

Full coding ranking

ReasoningClaude Sonnet 4.6

Full reasoning ranking

FactsClaude Sonnet 4.6

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsClaude Sonnet 4.6

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsClaude Sonnet 4.6
  • AA-LCRClaude Sonnet 4.6 by 10.769.380+10.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsClaude Sonnet 4.6
  • IFBenchClaude Sonnet 4.6 by 2.953.756.6+2.9

Full following instructions ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins all six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Claude Opus 4 wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.6. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Claude Opus 4 wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 and $15.00. That makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 about 80% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 21 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.