Claude Fable 5 vs HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Claude Fable 5 is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 12 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Claude Fable 53 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude Fable 52 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude Fable 52 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude Fable 51 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude Fable 51 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude Fable 5 pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+68.6points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+50.8points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+50points ahead
Where HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 12 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude Fable 5
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude Fable 5 by 50.862.912.1+50.8
- SciCodeClaude Fable 5 by 32.66128.4+32.6
ReasoningClaude Fable 5
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude Fable 5 by 5055.55.5+50
- GPQA DiamondClaude Fable 5 by 31.192.661.5+31.1
- CritPtClaude Fable 5 by 28.628.60+28.6
FactsClaude Fable 5
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude Fable 5 by 5065.315.4+50
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude Fable 5 by 17.636.418.8+17.6
Following instructionsClaude Fable 5
- IFBenchClaude Fable 5 by 25.663.537.9+25.6
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude Fable 5 by 96.643.3-53.3+96.6
- AA IntelligenceClaude Fable 5 by 38.249.611.4+38.2
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude Fable 5 by 11.198.587.4+11.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B)?
Claude Fable 5 wins all five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Claude Fable 5. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; HyperCLOVA X SEED Think (32B) wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 12 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.