Claude Haiku 4.5 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Wins 3 of 5 areas
Coding · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger all-rounder.ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude Haiku 4.52 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude Haiku 4.51 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude Haiku 4.51 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs 77% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude Haiku 4.5 pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+70.3points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+39.6points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+21.2points ahead
Where ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+13.9points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+1.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude Haiku 4.5
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude Haiku 4.5 by 21.227.36.1+21.2
- SciCodeClaude Haiku 4.5 by 10.742.231.5+10.7
ReasoningEven
- GPQA DiamondERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by 13.967.281.1+13.9
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude Haiku 4.5 by 7.110.43.3+7.1
- CritPttie00tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude Haiku 4.5 by 39.672.733.1+39.6
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by 1.11819.1+1.1
Following instructionsClaude Haiku 4.5
- IFBenchClaude Haiku 4.5 by 15.254.339.1+15.2
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude Haiku 4.5 by 54.754.70+54.7
- AA-OmniscienceClaude Haiku 4.5 by 30.7-4.4-35.1+30.7
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude Haiku 4.5 by 29.443.914.5+29.4
- AA Agentic IndexClaude Haiku 4.5 by 10.310.30+10.3
- AA IntelligenceClaude Haiku 4.5 by 9.416.97.5+9.4
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B?
Claude Haiku 4.5 wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, long documents and following instructions. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins none, but costs 77% less. They are level on reasoning and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Claude Haiku 4.5. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28 and $1.10. That makes ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B about 77% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.