Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Falcon H1R 7B
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Claude Haiku 4.52 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Claude Haiku 4.52 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking10Claude Haiku 4.51 of 3 tests · 2 ties
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10Claude Haiku 4.51 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude Haiku 4.51 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked00Even0 each · 1 tie
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude Haiku 4.5 pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+63.3points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+61.5points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+25points ahead
Where Falcon H1R 7B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude Haiku 4.5
- Terminal-Bench HardClaude Haiku 4.5 by 2527.32.3+25
- SciCodeClaude Haiku 4.5 by 17.342.224.9+17.3
ReasoningClaude Haiku 4.5
- GPQA DiamondClaude Haiku 4.5 by 1.167.266.1+1.1
- Humanity's Last Examtie10.411tie
- CritPttie00.3tie
FactsClaude Haiku 4.5
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude Haiku 4.5 by 61.572.711.2+61.5
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude Haiku 4.5 by 3.41814.6+3.4
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude Haiku 4.5 by 56.9-4.4-61.3+56.9
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexClaude Haiku 4.5 by 34.143.99.8+34.1
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude Haiku 4.5 by 26.954.727.8+26.9
- AA IntelligenceClaude Haiku 4.5 by 9.116.97.8+9.1
- AA Agentic IndexClaude Haiku 4.5 by 110.39.3+1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Falcon H1R 7B?
Claude Haiku 4.5 wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and long documents. Falcon H1R 7B wins none. They are level on following instructions.
Which is better for coding?
Claude Haiku 4.5. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Falcon H1R 7B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.