Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Mythos Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

13 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 13 shared benchmarks, Claude Mythos Preview scores higher on 13 and Gemini 3.1 Pro on 0. The widest gap is CyberGym, where Claude Mythos Preview scores 83.1 against 38.8.

ANTHROPICVSGOOGLE13 SHARED13–0 HEAD-TO-HEADNEWEST SCORE ADDED

At a glance

MakerAnthropicGoogle
Released—
Price per 1M tokens input / output—$2.00 / $12.00
Cost of 1M in + 1M out—$14.00
Head-to-head of 13 shared benchmarks13 wins0 wins
Scores tracked independently verified25 0 ◆215 30 ◆

Gemini 3.1 Pro's release date per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for Gemini 3.1 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.

Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins

AreaClaude Mythos PreviewWINSGemini 3.1 Pro
Reasoning20Claude Mythos Preview leads 2 of 2 · widest: Humanity's Last Exam 64.7 vs 47
Coding30Claude Mythos Preview leads 3 of 3 · widest: SWE-bench Pro 77.8 vs 54.2
Agentic20Claude Mythos Preview leads 2 of 2 · widest: OSWorld-Verified 79.6 vs 76.2
Multimodal10Claude Mythos Preview leads 1 of 1 · widest: CharXiv (RQ) 93.2 vs 83.3

Biggest gaps

Claude Mythos Preview pulls furthest ahead on

  1. SWE-bench Pro77.8 vs 54.2
  2. Humanity's Last Exam64.7 vs 47
  3. SWE-bench Verified93.9 vs 80.6

Gemini 3.1 Pro pulls furthest ahead on

No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.

Every shared benchmark13 · grouped by area

Multimodal 1

Other shared benchmarks 5

Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro withALL PAIRINGS →