Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

Anthropic · released

Wins 1 of 6 areas

Long documents

DeepSeek · released

Wins 2 of 6 areas

Agents · Reasoning

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus wins more areas, narrowly.Claude Sonnet 4 is better at long documents.

Scores updated · 20 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Sonnet 4$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from anthropic
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus$0.27 to read · $1.00 to write$1.27Price from Artificial Analysis

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus costs 93% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus pulls ahead

  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+8.6points aheadDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus44.9Claude Sonnet 436.3
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+5.7points aheadDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus16.4Claude Sonnet 410.7
  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+5points aheadDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus27.7Claude Sonnet 422.7

Where Claude Sonnet 4 pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+45.7points aheadClaude Sonnet 470.9DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus25.2
  • Keeps track of context across a multi-turn chatMulti-Challenge+2.7points aheadClaude Sonnet 457.1DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus54.4
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+2points aheadClaude Sonnet 440DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus38

Every test, side by side

All 20 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingEven

Full coding ranking

AgentsDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

Full agents ranking

ReasoningDeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsClaude Sonnet 4
  • AA-LCRClaude Sonnet 4 by 170.369.3+1

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsEven

Full following instructions ranking

Other results7 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4 or DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus wins two of the six areas where both have results: agents and reasoning. Claude Sonnet 4 wins long documents. They are level on coding, facts and following instructions.

Which is better for coding?

Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 3 both models report, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus costs $0.27 and $1.00. That makes DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus about 93% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 20 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.