Command A+ vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 6 areas
Agents
Command A+ is the stronger all-rounder.NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B is better at agents.
Scores updated · 17 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software30Command A+3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Command A+2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up10Command A+1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Command A+1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Command A+1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Command A+ pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+74.4points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+31points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+24.8points ahead
Where NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B pulls ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 17 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingCommand A+
- SciCodeCommand A+ by 22.438.516.1+22.4
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Command A+ by 19.122.83.7+19.1
- Terminal-Bench HardCommand A+ by 18.2256.8+18.2
AgentsNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B by 167+1
- Terminal-Bench 4.0tie0.50tie
ReasoningCommand A+
- GPQA DiamondCommand A+ by 24.876.151.3+24.8
- Humanity's Last ExamCommand A+ by 7.1124.9+7.1
- CritPttie0.30tie
FactsCommand A+
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationCommand A+ by 74.485.811.4+74.4
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracytie8.99.6tie
Following instructionsCommand A+
- IFBenchCommand A+ by 15.773.958.2+15.7
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceCommand A+ by 66.5-4-70.5+66.5
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Command A+ by 52.680.728.1+52.6
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexCommand A+ by 19.827.88+19.8
- AA IntelligenceCommand A+ by 8.313.14.8+8.3
- AA Agentic IndexCommand A+ by 1.33.62.3+1.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, Command A+ or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B?
Command A+ wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B wins agents.
Which is better for coding?
Command A+. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 4B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 17 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 12 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.