DeepSeek-R1 0528 vs EXAONE 4.0 32B
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
DeepSeek-R1 0528 is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 18 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30DeepSeek-R1 05283 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20DeepSeek-R1 05282 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20DeepSeek-R1 05282 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10DeepSeek-R1 05281 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10DeepSeek-R1 05281 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where DeepSeek-R1 0528 pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+41points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+16.6points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+12.1points ahead
Where EXAONE 4.0 32B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 18 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingDeepSeek-R1 0528
- Terminal-Bench HardDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 12.115.93.8+12.1
- SciCodeDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 5.940.334.4+5.9
ReasoningDeepSeek-R1 0528
- GPQA DiamondDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 7.481.373.9+7.4
- Humanity's Last ExamDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 4.415.811.4+4.4
- CritPtDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 1.41.40+1.4
FactsDeepSeek-R1 0528
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 16.630.513.9+16.6
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 2.416.614.2+2.4
Following instructionsDeepSeek-R1 0528
- IFBenchDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 3.339.636.3+3.3
Other results9 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 32.7-27.4-60.1+32.7
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)DeepSeek-R1 0528 by 19.236.517.3+19.2
- AA Agentic IndexDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 11.320.89.5+11.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 102414+10
- LiveCodeBenchEXAONE 4.0 32B by 7.673.380.9+7.6
- livecodebench_hardDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 7.363.656.3+7.3
- AA IntelligenceDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 4.913.18.2+4.9
- livecodebench_mediumDeepSeek-R1 0528 by 2.690.988.3+2.6
- livecodebench_easytie99.298.8tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, DeepSeek-R1 0528 or EXAONE 4.0 32B?
DeepSeek-R1 0528 wins all five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. EXAONE 4.0 32B wins none.
Which is better for coding?
DeepSeek-R1 0528. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; EXAONE 4.0 32B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 18 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.