Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Qwen3 235B A22B

DeepSeek · released

Wins 1 of 5 areas

Long documents

Alibaba · released

Wins 4 of 5 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Following instructions

Qwen3 235B A22B is the stronger all-rounder.DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is cheaper and better at long documents.

Scores updated · 18 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B$0.70 to read · $1.10 to write$1.80Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 235B A22B$0.70 to read · $2.80 to write$3.50Price from Alibaba's own price page

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B costs 49% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 235B A22B pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+29.8points aheadQwen3 235B A22B70DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B40.2
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+11.1points aheadQwen3 235B A22B38.7DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B27.6
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+8.6points aheadQwen3 235B A22B39.9DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B31.3

Where DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 18 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3 235B A22B

Full coding ranking

ReasoningQwen3 235B A22B

Full reasoning ranking

FactsQwen3 235B A22B

Full facts ranking

Long documentsDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B
  • AA-LCRDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B by 10100+10

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 235B A22B
  • IFBenchQwen3 235B A22B by 11.127.638.7+11.1

Full following instructions ranking

Other results9 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B or Qwen3 235B A22B?

Qwen3 235B A22B wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts and following instructions. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B wins long documents, and costs 49% less.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3 235B A22B. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B wins none.

Which is cheaper?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B costs $0.70 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B costs $0.70 and $2.80. That makes DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B about 49% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 18 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.