DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs DeepSeek-V3
Wins 0 of 4 areas
—
Wins 4 of 4 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions
DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger all-rounder.DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B is cheaper.
Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Coding, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B costs 49% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where DeepSeek-V3 pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+32points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+18.1points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+4points ahead
Where DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
ReasoningDeepSeek-V3
- GPQA DiamondDeepSeek-V3 by 461.565.5+4
- Humanity's Last Examtie4.64.7tie
Following instructionsDeepSeek-V3
- IFBenchDeepSeek-V3 by 18.122.941+18.1
Other results8 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Codeforces (Rating)DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B by 557 rating points16911134+557 rating
- AIME 2024DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B by 33.472.639.2+33.4
- AIME 2025DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B by 8.76051.3+8.7
- LiveCodeBenchDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B by 857.249.2+8
- HMMT Feb. 2025DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B by 4.133.329.2+4.1
- MATH-500 (EM)DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B by 4.194.390.2+4.1
- AA IntelligenceDeepSeek-V3 by 1.38.49.7+1.3
- BBHtie88.387.5tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B or DeepSeek-V3?
DeepSeek-V3 wins all four areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B wins none, but costs 49% less.
Which is better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3. It wins the one coding test both models report.
Which is cheaper?
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.29 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.24 and $0.90. That makes DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B about 49% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 5 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.