EXAONE 4.0 32B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 18 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Gemini 2.5 Flash2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Gemini 2.5 Flash2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Gemini 2.5 Flash1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Gemini 2.5 Flash1 of 1 test
- CodingWriting and fixing software11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 2.5 Flash pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+50.6points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+14points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+12.1points ahead
Where EXAONE 4.0 32B pulls ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+5.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 18 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingEven
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 2.5 Flash by 9.83.813.6+9.8
- SciCodeEXAONE 4.0 32B by 5.334.429.1+5.3
ReasoningGemini 2.5 Flash
- GPQA DiamondGemini 2.5 Flash by 5.173.979+5.1
- CritPtGemini 2.5 Flash by 1.101.1+1.1
- Humanity's Last Examtie11.412.1tie
FactsGemini 2.5 Flash
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 2.5 Flash by 12.113.925.9+12.1
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 2.5 Flash by 10.514.224.7+10.5
Long documentsGemini 2.5 Flash
- AA-LCRGemini 2.5 Flash by 50.614.765.3+50.6
Following instructionsGemini 2.5 Flash
- IFBenchGemini 2.5 Flash by 1436.350.3+14
Other results9 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 2.5 Flash by 30.3-60.1-29.8+30.3
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 2.5 Flash by 14.317.331.6+14.3
- AA Agentic IndexGemini 2.5 Flash by 9.39.518.8+9.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 2.5 Flash by 8.21422.2+8.2
- livecodebench_hardEXAONE 4.0 32B by 856.348.3+8
- livecodebench_mediumEXAONE 4.0 32B by 5.888.382.5+5.8
- AA IntelligenceGemini 2.5 Flash by 4.98.213.1+4.9
- LiveCodeBenchEXAONE 4.0 32B by 4.780.976.2+4.7
- livecodebench_easytie98.899.1tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, EXAONE 4.0 32B or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash wins four of the five areas where both have results: reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. EXAONE 4.0 32B wins none. They are level on coding.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 2 both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 18 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.