GPT-4o wins more areas, narrowly.EXAONE 4.0 32B is better at reasoning.
Scores updated · 18 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02GPT-4o2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01GPT-4o1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20EXAONE 4.0 32B2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software11Even1 each
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked00Even0 each · 1 tie
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where GPT-4o pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+47.9points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+41.3points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+9.8points ahead
Where EXAONE 4.0 32B pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+21.3points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+9.6points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+1.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 18 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingEven
- Terminal-Bench HardGPT-4o by 4.53.88.3+4.5
- SciCodeEXAONE 4.0 32B by 1.134.433.3+1.1
ReasoningEXAONE 4.0 32B
- GPQA DiamondEXAONE 4.0 32B by 21.373.952.6+21.3
- Humanity's Last ExamEXAONE 4.0 32B by 9.611.41.8+9.6
- CritPttie00tie
FactsGPT-4o
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGPT-4o by 47.914.262.1+47.9
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGPT-4o by 9.813.923.7+9.8
Other results9 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- livecodebench_mediumEXAONE 4.0 32B by 56.288.332.1+56.2
- livecodebench_hardEXAONE 4.0 32B by 51.856.34.5+51.8
- AA-OmniscienceGPT-4o by 49.6-60.1-10.5+49.6
- LiveCodeBenchEXAONE 4.0 32B by 42.680.938.3+42.6
- livecodebench_easyEXAONE 4.0 32B by 16.398.882.5+16.3
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)GPT-4o by 11.617.328.9+11.6
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGPT-4o by 10.21424.2+10.2
- AA Agentic IndexEXAONE 4.0 32B by 1.19.58.4+1.1
- AA Intelligencetie8.27.3tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, EXAONE 4.0 32B or GPT-4o?
GPT-4o wins two of the five areas where both have results: facts and long documents. EXAONE 4.0 32B wins reasoning. They are level on coding and following instructions.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 2 both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 18 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.