Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Mistral Medium (Non-Reasoning)
Wins 2 of 3 areas
Coding · Reasoning
Wins 0 of 3 areas
—
Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 11 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the three areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Coding and images and charts rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 1.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+24points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+17.7points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+1.1points ahead
Where Mistral Medium (Non-Reasoning) pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 11 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
ReasoningGemini 1.5 Pro
- GPQA DiamondGemini 1.5 Pro by 2458.934.9+24
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 1.5 Pro by 1.14.63.5+1.1
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- NarrativeQAGemini 1.5 Pro by 30.775.644.9+30.7
- MATHGemini 1.5 Pro by 25.982.556.5+25.9
- GSM8KGemini 1.5 Pro by 20.290.870.6+20.2
- MMLUGemini 1.5 Pro by 17.779.561.8+17.7
- naturalquestions_closedbookGemini 1.5 Pro by 16.645.529+16.6
- OpenBookQAGemini 1.5 Pro by 12.295.283+12.2
- AA IntelligenceGemini 1.5 Pro by 2.47.95.5+2.4
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Pro or Mistral Medium (Non-Reasoning)?
Gemini 1.5 Pro wins two of the three areas where both have results: coding and reasoning. Mistral Medium (Non-Reasoning) wins none. They are level on images and charts.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro. It wins the one coding test both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 11 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.