Which is better, Gemini 1.5 Pro or Qwen3.5 2B?

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 2B

13 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 13 shared benchmarks, Gemini 1.5 Pro scores higher on 10 and Qwen3.5 2B on 3. The widest gap is Artificial Analysis Coding Index, where Gemini 1.5 Pro scores 23.6 against 2.9.

GOOGLEVSALIBABA13 SHARED10–3 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProMARGINQwen3.5 2B

AA Intelligence106.9

Artificial Analysis Coding Index23.62.9

BLINK6148.6

GPQA Diamond59.151.6

HLE4.95

ifeval89.478.6

MathVista70.648.7

MMLU-Pro75.866.5

MMMU (val) (Pass@1)54.144.1

MMMU-Pro5543

OCRBench8086.1

scicode29.57.2

TextVQA-val64.577.3

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare Gemini 1.5 Pro withALL PAIRINGS →

GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3 Pro Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 E2B

Across the fieldQwen3.6 27B Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.8 Max Preview Qwen3.7 Plus Preview Claude Opus 4 Qwen3.5 4B Gemini 3.6 Flash Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare Qwen3.5 2B withALL PAIRINGS →

AlibabaQwen3.5 35B A3B Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B Qwen3.5 27B Qwen3.6 Plus

Across the fieldClaude Sonnet 4 Claude Sonnet 5 Muse Spark 1.1 GLM-5.1 GLM-5.2 o4-mini Claude Sonnet 4.6 o1