Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Solar Pro 3
Wins 6 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is the stronger all-rounder.Solar Pro 3 is cheaper.
Scores updated · 17 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software30Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview3 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview1 of 3 tests · 2 ties
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Solar Pro 3 costs 57% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+42points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+19.1points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+17.9points ahead
Where Solar Pro 3 pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 17 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 19.131.112+19.1
- SciCodeGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 17.943.425.5+17.9
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 16.624.27.6+16.6
AgentsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 19.78.7+1
- Terminal-Bench 4.0tie0.50tie
- GDPValtie00tie
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 9.882.272.4+9.8
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 6.917.210.3+6.9
- CritPtGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 1.11.10+1.1
FactsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 17.836.318.5+17.8
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 5.517.311.8+5.5
Long documentsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
- AA-LCRGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 4274.332.3+42
Following instructionsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
- IFBenchGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 677.271.2+6
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Solar Pro 3 by 5531.386.3+55
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 37-16.4-53.4+37
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 18.534.716.2+18.5
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by 7.815.67.8+7.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Solar Pro 3?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Solar Pro 3 wins none, but costs 57% less.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Solar Pro 3 wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 3 costs $0.15 and $0.60. That makes Solar Pro 3 about 57% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 17 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.