Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Seed 2.1 Pro Preview
Wins 0 of 4 areas
—
Wins 2 of 4 areas
Coding · Images and charts
Seed 2.1 Pro Preview wins more areas, narrowly.
Scores updated · 24 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Seed 2.1 Pro Preview pulls ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+52.7points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+13points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+5.9points ahead
Where Gemini 3.5 Flash pulls ahead
- Long professional tasks in banking, consulting and lawAA ApexAgents+13.3points ahead
- Abstract visual puzzles that people can solveARC-AGI-2+9.6points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+7.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 24 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingSeed 2.1 Pro Preview
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Gemini 3.5 Flash by 7.778.771+7.7
- SciCodeSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 5.953.959.8+5.9
- SWE-bench ProSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 2.455.157.5+2.4
- LMArena · WebDevSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 20 rating points14991519+20 rating
AgentsEven
- GDPValSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 52.735.287.9+52.7
- AA ApexAgentsGemini 3.5 Flash by 13.347.133.8+13.3
- OSWorld-Verifiedtie78.478.8tie
- MCP Atlastie83.683.8tie
ReasoningEven
- Humanity's Last ExamSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 1342.755.7+13
- ARC-AGI-2Gemini 3.5 Flash by 9.672.162.5+9.6
Images and chartsSeed 2.1 Pro Preview
- CharXiv (RQ)Seed 2.1 Pro Preview by 2.284.286.4+2.2
- Video-MMESeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 287.289.2+2
- MMMU-ProGemini 3.5 Flash by 1.684.382.7+1.6
Other results11 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- OVBenchSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 13.556.570+13.5
- TOMATOSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 7.671.979.5+7.6
- ToolathlonGemini 3.5 Flash by 5.956.550.6+5.9
- DeepSWEGemini 3.5 Flash by 4.33732.7+4.3
- MotionBenchSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 4.370.674.9+4.3
- TVBenchSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 4.176.480.5+4.1
- LongVideoBenchSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 377.680.6+3
- MinervaSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 2.168.670.7+2.1
- LVBenchSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 1.776.378+1.7
- VideoHolmesSeed 2.1 Pro Preview by 1.167.168.2+1.1
- VideoSimpleQAtie7676.4tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Seed 2.1 Pro Preview?
Seed 2.1 Pro Preview wins two of the four areas where both have results: coding and images and charts. Gemini 3.5 Flash wins none. They are level on agents and reasoning.
Which is better for coding?
Seed 2.1 Pro Preview. It wins 3 of the 4 coding tests both models report; Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 1.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 24 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.