Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon

Google · released

Wins 1 of 6 areas

Long documents

Google · released

Wins 5 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Math

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger all-rounder.Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper and better at long documents.

Both rank among the ten best models we track in facts.

Scores updated · 27 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.75 to read · $3.75 to write$4.50Price from Artificial Analysis
Gemini 4 Argon$2.00 to read · $10.00 to write$12Price from Google's own price page

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 63% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Gemini 4 Argon pulls ahead

  • Extremely hard research-level math problemsFrontierMath Tier 4+56.1points aheadGemini 4 Argon78Gemini 3.8 Flash21.9
  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+40.1points aheadGemini 4 Argon84.9Gemini 3.8 Flash44.8
  • Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+37.4points aheadGemini 4 Argon57.1Gemini 3.8 Flash19.7

Where Gemini 3.8 Flash pulls ahead

  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+4.7points aheadGemini 3.8 Flash54.6Gemini 4 Argon49.9
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+1.6points aheadGemini 3.8 Flash81.3Gemini 4 Argon79.7

Every test, side by side

All 27 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGemini 4 Argon

Full coding ranking

AgentsGemini 4 Argon
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Gemini 4 Argon by 37.419.757.1+37.4
  • GDPValGemini 4 Argon by 9.446.856.2+9.4

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGemini 4 Argon

Full reasoning ranking

FactsGemini 4 Argon

Full facts ranking

MathGemini 4 Argon

Full math ranking

Long documentsGemini 3.8 Flash
  • AA-LCRGemini 3.8 Flash by 1.681.379.7+1.6

Full long documents ranking

Other results13 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Gemini 4 Argon by 38.319.157.4+38.3
  • HiL-Bench (Tools-allowed)Gemini 4 Argon by 20.541.562+20.5
  • AA-OmniscienceGemini 4 Argon by 12.829.642.4+12.8
  • AA IntelligenceGemini 4 Argon by 11.740.952.6+11.7
  • OSWorld 2.0Gemini 4 Argon by 10.25969.2+10.2
  • HealthBench HardGemini 4 Argon by 7.238.245.4+7.2
  • HealthBench Pro, with Search groundingGemini 4 Argon by 5.271.576.7+5.2
  • LVBenchGemini 4 Argon by 4.687.191.7+4.6
  • DeepSWE 1.1Gemini 4 Argon by 4.273.777.9+4.2
  • HealthBench Pro, without Search groundingGemini 4 Argon by 3.465.468.8+3.4
  • HealthBench Pro, without Search grounding (length-adjusted)Gemini 4 Argon by 2.853.756.5+2.8
  • HealthBench Pro, with Search grounding (length-adjusted)Gemini 4 Argon by 2.758.761.4+2.7
  • ARC-AGI-1tie98.598.5tie

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and math. Gemini 3.8 Flash wins long documents, and costs 63% less.

Which is better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemini 3.8 Flash wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 and $10.00. That makes Gemini 3.8 Flash about 63% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 27 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 14 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 13 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.