Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Google · released

Wins 2 of 6 areas

Reasoning · Facts

Anthropic · released

Wins 4 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Math · Long documents

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger all-rounder.Gemini 4 Argon is better at reasoning.

Scores updated · 25 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Gemini 4 Argon$2.00 to read · $10.00 to write$12Price from Google's own price page
Claude Sonnet 5.5$2.00 to read · $10.00 to write$12Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Sonnet 5.5 pulls ahead

  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+10.7points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.566.9Gemini 4 Argon56.2
  • Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+6.5points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.563.6Gemini 4 Argon57.1
  • Research-level physics problemsCritPt+4.3points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.531.4Gemini 4 Argon27.1

Where Gemini 4 Argon pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+31.9points aheadGemini 4 Argon84.9Claude Sonnet 5.553
  • Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+29.5points aheadGemini 4 Argon76Claude Sonnet 5.546.5
  • Solves new puzzle games it has never seenARC-AGI-3+22points aheadGemini 4 Argon46.3Claude Sonnet 5.524.3

Every test, side by side

All 25 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Sonnet 5.5

Full coding ranking

AgentsClaude Sonnet 5.5
  • GDPValClaude Sonnet 5.5 by 10.756.266.9+10.7
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 by 6.557.163.6+6.5

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGemini 4 Argon

Full reasoning ranking

FactsGemini 4 Argon

Full facts ranking

MathClaude Sonnet 5.5

Full math ranking

Long documentsClaude Sonnet 5.5
  • AA-LCRClaude Sonnet 5.5 by 379.782.7+3

Full long documents ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 by 13.257.470.6+13.2
  • HealthBenchClaude Sonnet 5.5 by 1349.162.1+13
  • AA-OmniscienceGemini 4 Argon by 10.142.432.3+10.1
  • HealthBench ProfessionalClaude Sonnet 5.5 by 7.955.163+7.9
  • DeepSWE 1.1Gemini 4 Argon by 6.977.971+6.9
  • CritPt v2 HardClaude Sonnet 5.5 by 6.552.559+6.5
  • GDP (Surge AI)Claude Sonnet 5.5 by 421.825.8+4
  • AA IntelligenceClaude Sonnet 5.5 by 3.452.656+3.4
  • HLE-DiamondGemini 4 Argon by 3.456.753.3+3.4
  • ARC-AGI-1Gemini 4 Argon by 298.596.5+2
  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1tie52.953.3tie

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 wins four of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, math and long documents. Gemini 4 Argon wins reasoning and facts.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemini 4 Argon wins none, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 and $10.00. For a million tokens read plus a million written, they cost about the same.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 25 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 14 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.