Gemma 3n E2B Instruct vs MiMo V2.5 Pro
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
MiMo V2.5 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 20 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking03MiMo V2.5 Pro3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software02MiMo V2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02MiMo V2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01MiMo V2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01MiMo V2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where MiMo V2.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+68.7points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+63.7points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+57.9points ahead
Where Gemma 3n E2B Instruct pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 20 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMiMo V2.5 Pro
- SciCodeMiMo V2.5 Pro by 45.45.250.6+45.4
- Terminal-Bench HardMiMo V2.5 Pro by 42.40.843.2+42.4
ReasoningMiMo V2.5 Pro
- GPQA DiamondMiMo V2.5 Pro by 63.722.986.6+63.7
- Humanity's Last ExamMiMo V2.5 Pro by 31.54.235.7+31.5
- CritPtMiMo V2.5 Pro by 404+4
FactsMiMo V2.5 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationMiMo V2.5 Pro by 68.76.675.3+68.7
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMiMo V2.5 Pro by 15.66.822.4+15.6
Following instructionsMiMo V2.5 Pro
- IFBenchMiMo V2.5 Pro by 57.92279.9+57.9
Other results11 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)MiMo V2.5 Pro by 94.2094.2+94.2
- AA-OmniscienceMiMo V2.5 Pro by 83.5-80.23.3+83.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexMiMo V2.5 Pro by 582.260.2+58
- ARC-ChallengeMiMo V2.5 Pro by 45.551.797.2+45.5
- BBHMiMo V2.5 Pro by 44.144.388.4+44.1
- DROPMiMo V2.5 Pro by 32.453.986.3+32.4
- AA Agentic IndexMiMo V2.5 Pro by 29.1029.1+29.1
- AA IntelligenceMiMo V2.5 Pro by 21.24.826+21.2
- TriviaQAMiMo V2.5 Pro by 20.560.881.3+20.5
- WinoGrandeMiMo V2.5 Pro by 18.866.885.6+18.8
- HellaSwagMiMo V2.5 Pro by 17.672.289.8+17.6
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instruct or MiMo V2.5 Pro?
MiMo V2.5 Pro wins all five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Gemma 3n E2B Instruct wins none.
Which is better for coding?
MiMo V2.5 Pro. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemma 3n E2B Instruct wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 20 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.