LFM3-VL-2B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 28 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where LFM3-VL-2B pulls ahead
Where Gemma 4 E2B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 28 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsLFM3-VL-2B
Other results24 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- ScreenSpot-v2 WebLFM3-VL-2B by 67.522.489.9+67.5
- ScreenSpot-v2 DesktopLFM3-VL-2B by 66.528.194.6+66.5
- ChartQA TestLFM3-VL-2B by 49.543.292.7+49.5
- ScreenSpot-v2 MobileLFM3-VL-2B by 49.342.992.2+49.3
- MMELFM3-VL-2B by 3254.986.9+32
- InfographicVQA (val)LFM3-VL-2B by 31.854.486.2+31.8
- TextVQA-valLFM3-VL-2B by 25.462.587.9+25.4
- MMBenchLFM3-VL-2B by 21.964.286.1+21.9
- Multilingual MMBenchLFM3-VL-2B by 20.862.883.6+20.8
- OCRBench v2_enLFM3-VL-2B by 2043.563.5+20
- RealWorldQALFM3-VL-2B by 19.36079.3+19.3
- Math & logical reasoningLFM3-VL-2B by 1751.868.8+17
- PerceptionLFM3-VL-2B by 16.559.175.6+16.5
- OCRBench v1LFM3-VL-2B by 16.170.286.3+16.1
- MMMU (val) (Pass@1)LFM3-VL-2B by 14.641.155.7+14.6
- Document, OCR & ChartLFM3-VL-2B by 11.672.383.9+11.6
- DocVQA-valLFM3-VL-2B by 1185.796.7+11
- MMMBLFM3-VL-2B by 10.974.385.2+10.9
- GeneralLFM3-VL-2B by 9.156.966+9.1
- SimpleVQALFM3-VL-2B by 927.336.3+9
- MM-IFEvalLFM3-VL-2B by 7.265.672.8+7.2
- SEED-Bench (image)LFM3-VL-2B by 7.271.478.6+7.2
- HallusionBenchLFM3-VL-2B by 5.859.865.6+5.8
- POPELFM3-VL-2B by 4.78488.7+4.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or LFM3-VL-2B?
LFM3-VL-2B wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. Gemma 4 E2B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 28 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 24 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.