Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemma 4 E2B vs Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct

Google · released

Wins 0 of 1 area

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 1 of 1 area

Images and charts

Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Images and charts rests on a single test.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct pulls ahead

  • Reads text in imagesOCRBench+3.2points aheadQwen3 VL 2B Instruct75.1Gemma 4 E2B71.9

Where Gemma 4 E2B pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

Images and chartsQwen3 VL 2B Instruct
  • OCRBenchQwen3 VL 2B Instruct by 3.271.975.1+3.2

Full images and charts ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 2B Instruct wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. Gemma 4 E2B wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.